Articles

How the President Can Aid Immigration Reform

February 07, 2013

There was rare good news from Washington last week, as eight senators—four from each party—announced a "Bipartisan Framework for Comprehensive Immigration Reform."

The so-called Gang of Eight proposed a "tough but fair path" to citizenship for undocumented immigrants that would commence only after the federal government secured the borders and put in place systems to prevent foreigners from overstaying their visas and to help employers verify that any new hires are legal.

This "border-security first" approach would require those now in America without permission to surface, register with immigration officials, and pass a background check. Any person with a serious criminal record or who poses a national-security threat would be deported. The rest would have to pay fines and back taxes to earn "probationary legal status."

Then they would have to wait to begin the process of applying for a green card and (if they choose) for citizenship until after a commission of border-state governors, attorneys general and community leaders affirm that the border is under operational control.

This means the process of regularization could take years—perhaps longer than a decade. Meanwhile, these "probationary legal residents" would not be eligible for welfare, ObamaCare or other public assistance.

The Gang of Eight framework also calls for a market-driven guest-worker program. This isn't only important for sectors like agriculture. It is also critical to reducing pressure on the border and making operational control more likely.

The bipartisan plan would also increase U.S. competitiveness by giving a green card to foreign students graduating from American universities with a Ph.D. or master's degree in science, technology, engineering and math.

Gang of Eight member Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) was incorrect to say that this framework mirrors previous immigration proposals. Making any path to citizenship contingent upon first securing the border distinguishes this approach from earlier ones, including the 2007 legislation advocated by President George W. Bush.

Moreover, the ideas behind the approach are popular. A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Wednesday found 83% of those surveyed support stricter border control while 55% favor a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

The framework of the proposed reforms highlights the persuasive powers of Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), who reportedly helped convince Senate Democrats that "border-security first" and a difficult, lengthy but attainable path to citizenship are essential to making reform both possible and durable.

A bipartisan House group is also at work on immigration. Among the Republican congressmen reportedly involved are John Carter and Sam Johnson, both Texans generally skeptical of offering illegal immigrants a path to legal status. Also involved is tea partier Raul Labrador of Idaho and Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida. The presence of these congressmen in the discussion suggests an understanding among House Democrats that border security is a necessary precondition for getting a bipartisan deal.

But there are potentially significant differences between President Obama and the Gang of Eight. An unnamed administration official told the Washington Post last week that Mr. Obama would not endorse a security-first proposal. The White House has also signaled that the president favors a fast, easy path to citizenship. And while Mr. Obama didn't mention guest workers when he spoke about immigration in Las Vegas last week, AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka—an avowed opponent of any guest-worker program—sat in the front row.

The president can sabotage a deal by insisting on provisions (such as automatic citizenship or protections for same-sex couples) that appeal to his base but make it impossible to earn passage through the Republican-controlled House. If he does so, he would show that he is more interested in using immigration as a political weapon than in finding a solution.

To resolve this issue, Mr. Obama should play it low-key. In this instance, unlike in foreign policy, the president ought to lead from behind. That means supporting the framework agreed to by members of Congress, not insisting on his own. That should be easy enough. After all, Mr. Obama hasn't offered a concrete immigration proposal for four years. It would be good if he didn't try now.

Being constructive also means cooling his rhetoric. That won't be easy for the reflexively polarizing president. The Gang of Eight rushed to issue its framework the day before Mr. Obama's Las Vegas speech to discourage him from saying something that might undermine a bipartisan effort. They largely succeeded: The president reportedly toned down his remarks. With Mr. Obama, this constitutes impressive progress.

Members of Congress from both parties know that Mr. Obama can't be counted on to lead in a way that narrows differences and brings people together. The best to hope for is that the president chooses not to make himself an impediment to bipartisanship. If that happens, it will be a first for Mr. Obama. Here's hoping.

A version of this article appeared February 7, 2013, on page A13 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: How the President Can Aid Immigration Reform and online at WSJ.com.

Related Article

5025443fefb994cb1d7d44be676c354c
April 28, 2016 |
Article
The presidential front-runners, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, won huge victories Tuesday. Yet their romps through the Acela primaries (named for the train that speeds through the Northeast region) cannot hide the disunion in the...
04edb9e32335deb501ad06d6add64d40
April 21, 2016 |
Article
New York was generous Tuesday to its native son Donald Trump. He grabbed 89 of the 95 delegates up for grabs and for the first time in any state received more than 50% of the vote. ...
D816b3432fd2941301a2484ed48892cf
April 14, 2016 |
Article
"He can run, but he can’t hide,” Joe Louis once said of fellow boxer Billy Conn. The same might be said of Donald Trump. In March the Republican front-runner gave three long, revealing interviews—two with the ...
5667ad7eb838913572e3b84e5da527a6
April 07, 2016 |
Article
The Real Clear Politics average of Wisconsin polls (March 23-April 3) pointed to a close race, placing Ted Cruz ahead of Donald Trump by 39% to 35%. But the final week leading to Tuesday’s primary was not kind to Mr....

Button karlsbooks 8115560310d99dcf7066a6791c2abb0e6e44efbce9d2a69ac5febbadd06cf979
Button readinglist 0c30cf88cf3c963eb72013f1b5906b6848694ba842d6efa0de8d2d3efbfd8fd2
Button nextapperance d1e601b7044cba97bcfe46cdf8bc572ab09797ca56157b5f533c25051217bb69