Articles

Trump Plots To Erase His Tax Cut

June 28, 2018
7090d2fcdc121725c4e28a9592bcc450

President Trump is justifiably proud of passing tax reform last December, telling audiences “because of our tax cuts, you can keep more of your hard-earned money.” He’s right: American taxpayers will save $75 billion this year and $189 billion next year, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Yet the president’s tariffs on imports could negate much of the tax relief he’s been bragging about. These levies are not paid by foreign countries or companies. They are passed on to American consumers in the form of higher prices for either foreign or U.S.-made goods.

The Trump tariffs are now clawing back tax savings at a rate of roughly $10.6 billion per year. The levies already in place include 25% on steel (imports in 2017 were an estimated $23.4 billion), 30% on solar panels ($8.5 billion), 10% on aluminum ($18 billion) and 20% on washing machines ($1.8 billion).

That’s chump change compared with what may be coming. On July 6, a 25% tariff kicks in on 818 Chinese imports worth $34 billion, costing Americans another $8.5 billion a year. If China retaliates, Mr. Trump has said he’ll slap a 10% tariff on an additional $200 billion of Chinese exports. The president warned last week that if Beijing responds a second time, he could levy a tariff on $200 billion more in Chinese exports. And an administration proposal for a 25% tariff on 284 Chinese exports to the U.S., whose value was $16 billion in 2017, is pending.

When the European Union imposed tariffs on selected American goods after being hit with U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs, Mr. Trump threatened a 20% tariff on cars imported from the EU. The administration hasn’t been clear whether this would hit only auto sales—whose value in 2017 was $43.4 billion—or also include parts, valued at $14.5 billion.

As if this weren’t bad enough, on May 23 Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross ordered an investigation into whether imports of foreign-made cars, sport-utility vehicles, vans and light trucks threaten “national security.” If the administration finds that Toyotas, VWs and Range Rovers are a danger to the U.S., Mr. Trump reportedly will ask for up to a 25% tariff on all imported autos and car parts. With these valued at $324 billion in 2017, it could cost Americans $81 billion a year.

All these actions add up to $19 billion a year in new tariffs already levied or pending, and potentially up to $125 billion a year more from additional tariffs the administration has threatened. Most of this money will come from Americans’ family budgets, erasing a large share of their savings from the tax cut.

Some of the price will also be paid in job losses. The president will have trouble escaping blame for this. Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey confronted Mr. Ross at a recent hearing about the plight of Allegheny Technologies , a Pittsburgh metals company. It imports specialty steel not commercially available in the U.S. The administration’s new steel tariff could cost 100 workers their jobs if Allegheny doesn’t get a tariff exemption.

Retaliatory tariffs levied by foreign countries will cause U.S. companies to move jobs overseas. Just as Harley-Davidson is seeking to keep its European sales from being slammed by the EU’s retaliatory tariffs, Kraft Heinz may move some production to Canada to keep ketchup sales there from being hit with a new Canadian tariff.

If the goal is a level playing field, tariffs are not the answer. One alternative: The Trump administration should reconsider its aversion to litigating these disputes before the World Trade Organization. In 2017, Bloomberg found the U.S. had an 86% success rate for its trade complaints at the WTO. America now has 117 cases pending at the global body. One filed in March by the Trump administration challenges China’s theft of U.S. intellectual property.

Mr. Trump chose a politically popular and economically productive path by embracing pro-growth tax reform. But the wave of tariffs he’s imposed or threatened could erase the progress he’s made—not only for family budgets but for his political fortunes.

Continue reading at WSJ.com

Related Article

1a8167938453df065a0cf9a7c5f8675a
May 16, 2019 |
Article
Even before Joe Biden announced he was running for president, pundits savaged him. A CNN editor at large dismissed the 76-year old as “a white man who has spent his entire professional life in elected office” running “to lead a party that is increasingly ...
46e7aaadb3c104a3ac57bbaf0a5d3b1e
May 09, 2019 |
Article
It’s the paradox of success. With 3.6% unemployment and 3.2% growth in gross domestic product, voters are turning to other issues.  ...
B7f21c79df2090eb74316e5da2048c01
May 07, 2019 |
Article
The attempted Democratic takedown of Attorney General William Barr last week during his Senate Judiciary Committee appearance was a thing to behold.  ...
5d1b326101d54786ed317485f67ebf5d
May 02, 2019 |
Article
The first polls following the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report flash warning signs for congressional Democrats. It’s not looking good for their investigate-and-impeach strategy. ...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance