Who Are the ‘Obstructionists’ Again?

January 26, 2017

When Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, complained that “this cabinet selection has been a disaster,” he was referring to President Trump’s choices. Mr. Schumer’s words, however, better describe how congressional Democrats have mishandled the confirmation process.

The minority party always hopes to notch a victory or two. But rather than concentrating their fire on a few of Mr. Trump’s more vulnerable picks, Democrats have gone after virtually every nominee. The result has been a clutter of messages that diluted the attacks and revealed the effort as nothing more than a massive political hit job.

Some overzealous Democrats damaged themselves in the process. One example is the salvo by Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) against Sen. Jeff Sessions, nominated for attorney general. In 2015 Mr. Booker said that he was “blessed and honored to have partnered with Sen. Sessions” to sponsor the Congressional Gold Medal for the Selma civil-rights marchers. But now Mr. Booker has adopted a far different tone.

Mr. Sessions, formerly a U.S. attorney and Alabama attorney general, desegregated his state’s schools and successfully prosecuted a Klan leader for murder. No matter. In confirmation hearings this month Mr. Booker asserted that Mr. Sessions would refuse to “pursue justice for women,” defend gays and lesbians, or stand up for voting rights. Mr. Booker offered not a shred of evidence in support. This smear was an ugly way for him (unofficially) to begin his 2020 presidential campaign.

Then there was the circus in the Senate Finance Committee over Steven Mnuchin’s nomination for Treasury secretary. The usually thoughtful and mild-mannered Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.) proved he makes a pathetic attack dog. To “assess your qualifications,” Mr. Wyden demanded that Mr. Mnuchin lay out specific steps for strengthening Medicare and fighting terrorist financing. When the nominee demurred, but promised to scrupulously follow the law and work with the committee on needed changes, Mr. Wyden feigned outrage.

Contrast this with Mr. Wyden’s treatment of President Obama’s last Treasury nominee, Jack Lew, during his 2013 confirmation hearing. The senator asked Mr. Lew if he agreed Congress should stop making piecemeal changes to the tax code. “I hadn’t actually thought about whether there was an approach like the one you described,” Mr. Lew responded. “I’d be happy to have discussion with you about it.” Mr. Wyden seemed satisfied.

Then the senator asked about an IRS determination on eligibility for ObamaCare tax credits. Mr. Lew sidestepped that, too, saying it was the IRS’s decision but he would be “delighted” to discuss legislative changes with Mr. Wyden. The senator replied, “I appreciate your saying that you’re going to work with me,” and then moved on. Sen. Wyden’s double standard is obvious.

Related Article

February 16, 2017 |
Trump’s missteps have energized the left, but tea-party comparisons are overwrought. ...
February 09, 2017 |
What ‘sanctuary cities’ have in common with 1832 South Carolina. ...
February 02, 2017 |
Trump mismanaged the travel ban rollout. The next crisis could be more serious. ...
January 19, 2017 |
Donald J. Trump is about to be sworn in as America’s 45th president, after an astonishing victory in an extraordinary election. Mr. Trump’s insurgency first prevailed against a broad field of Republican heavyweights. Then the tycoon faced the formidable C...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance