Articles

Clinton Grooves a Pitch, Trump Whiffs

June 09, 2016
3fa496559a1b47c94dacd5fbf193ef35

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have pivoted to the general election—and their attacks on each other so far suggest that the next 152 days will be ugly.

Start with Mrs. Clinton. Last week in San Diego she gave what was billed as a major speech on foreign affairs. Yet in about 4,000 words she devoted only 714 to defending her record as secretary of state and 961 to articulating future policies. She spent 2,115 words—51%—bashing Mr. Trump.

Mrs. Clinton lacerated him for holding “dangerously incoherent” ideas and described him as “temperamentally unfit” for the presidency, “not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes.” Her speech was focused, well constructed and (for her) adequately delivered. But in this era of social networks, voters collect information in diffuse ways; it will take more than one speech to firmly plant these impressions with voters.

In turn, Mr. Trump must answer attacks more effectively. His response was surprisingly weak for someone who prides himself on being a counterpuncher. Mrs. Clinton’s speech provided a treasure trove of subjects for him to punch back on: He could have attacked her for failing to reset U.S.-Russia relations, to end North Korea’s nuclear program, to stop Libya from descending into chaos after Moammar Gadhafi’s removal, or to keep ISIS from establishing a Middle East caliphate.

Mr. Trump could have criticized her for backing the Iranian nuclear deal. He could have undermined her claim that she fought for “better services for our veterans” by quoting her statement last year that problems in the Department of Veterans Affairs weren’t “as widespread as it has been made out to be.”

He could have offered voters a simple choice: If you like America’s standing in the world today and believe in the Obama administration’s foreign policy, vote for Hillary; if not, vote for Trump.

Instead, Mr. Trump raged that her “pathetic” speech “had nothing to do with foreign policy.” He then offered the press his chin. In her speech, Mrs. Clinton said that he would encourage Japan to acquire nuclear weapons. This, Mr. Trump, replied, was a lie. But in an April 3 interview on Fox News Sunday, he said that Japan might be better off defending itself, “including with nukes.”

Mr. Trump also attacked Mrs. Clinton for voting in favor of the Iraq war, boasting, “I’m the one who didn’t want to go in Iraq.” The record shows otherwise. After supporting the Iraq war before its 2003 start, Mr. Trump publicly opposed it only in the late summer of 2004.

These missed opportunities suggest that Mr. Trump doesn’t have advisers who look at Mrs. Clinton’s utterances and suggest ways to go after her—or who track his utterances and tell him to stop contradicting himself. His campaign badly needs discipline, a plan of attack, loads of research and robust rapid-response capability.

In the months ahead, Mrs. Clinton will say that she is experienced and qualified, while Mr. Trump is risky, dangerous and repulsive. He will say that he represents the change voters crave, while she would be a third term for President Obama. They can’t make these points only once or even episodically: Winning presidential candidates methodically and relentlessly prosecute their campaign’s narrative, freshening and extending it every week.

To read more visit WSJ.com

Related Article

A476b40d267cfc263ad453234f86b0c4
October 11, 2018 |
Article
Many Republicans celebrated Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s swearing-in Monday as the end of a bitter confirmation battle. But the game isn’t over.  ...
Cf217cbc355dc10f4f3e9dfb577b39ab
October 04, 2018 |
Article
Following last week’s extraordinary testimony by Prof. Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, public attitudes are split and malleable.   ...
1d050a8f3afb58449cbeb2570b2e4943
September 27, 2018 |
Article
Thursday will be an immensely consequential day for America. As of this writing, Christine Blasey Ford is scheduled to appear in the morning before the Senate Judiciary Committee, followed by Judge Brett Kavanaugh.  ...
1dfb83046819c706e17327948a180a28
September 20, 2018 |
Article
The Democrats’ most potent national policy issue in the 2018 midterms is health care, and it’s showing up on TV. One Arizona ad says Martha McSally, the Republican congresswoman running for Senate, “voted to gut protections for people with pre-existing co...
Button karlsbooks
Button readinglist
Button nextapperance